So I guess what the author is trying to get across is how much the artists who use data aesthetics try to hide information  it is always going to leak out somehow. Theres no data without information. But is data aesthetics alone to be art? Should artists be against information produced by data? Does too much information take away from the art? I think its a balancing act between data and information in the art, theres no hiding every bit of information, I think the artist that came the closest in the authors point of view was Dragulescu’s spam pieces. He doesn’t release any of the data that makes up these artworks. We know as views that the data came from spam, but how? and the author describes this as just data from spam as into a aesthetic structure. I think the author leans heavily toward Dragulescu’s work more than any of the others.