In response to NeMe’s Trouble at the Interface 2.0 I did not take much away from the text due to its dense and more academic nature. Also because Huhtamo writes in this manner it makes it more difficult to follow although his statements about the connection between the Art, Artist and Viewer makes sense. He goes about his argument in a long winded manner.
However I disagree with the part of his argument about how Interactive art should be contained in one definition. I believe that since it is art it can’t be contained and what people consider interactive changes with time. His definition makes interactive art seem stagnant and unchangeable which is the issue.