I found the way the author of this article described Pollock’s work very interesting. It seems that Pollock’s work either caused intrigue or some feeling of darkness, or maybe even confusion. The article also says that he created magnificent paintings, but also destroyed painting. Because he was creating things people had never seen before and completely went against any traditional forms of painting I do not think it is necessarily fair to say that he destroyed painting. I do not feel that when I see his paintings, to me they are very freely formed and natural.