In reading NeMe: Trouble at the Interface by Erkki Huhtamo, it resembled the article Digital Media and Contemporary Art in that both wrote about pieces they have seen and the connection they see between contemporary art and technology. NeMe: Trouble at the Interface, though, was a bit more difficult to understand because the authors points…
Category: NeMe: Trouble at the Interface 2.0 Reading
Trouble at the Interface 2.0
While reading Erkki Huhtamo’s paper “ Trouble at the Interface 2.0 “, I felt like I could not follow his paper properly. The author was going off about reasons why interactive art should have a specific definition rather than a broad one. However, he was making too many points at once and including many different…
In response to NeMe’s Trouble at the Interface 2.0
In response to NeMe’s Trouble at the Interface 2.0 I did not take much away from the text due to its dense and more academic nature. Also because Huhtamo writes in this manner it makes it more difficult to follow although his statements about the connection between the Art, Artist and Viewer makes sense. He…
NeMe: Trouble at the Interface 2.0
Interactive art has always been something that has caught my attention because of the power the user has on the medium. While reading the article I felt like the author just filled it to the brim with lots of information but it was personally pretty difficult to find any big meaning of the text relating…
Response to NeMe: Trouble at the Interface 2.0
To start off I would like to say that the paper NeMe: Trouble at the Interface 2.0 by Erkki Huhtamo is highly technical and dry, with a lot of good references and their explanations, but not a lot of iteration on the actual substance of interactive art. I would agree more with the paper if it presented…